Sermon- January 1, 2006
C. Douglas Simmons, D.Min.
St.. Paul's Episcopal
Church
The Challenge of the “Sanctus
Words are peculiar things in that they can convey different
meanings
depending upon who is the speaker and who is the listener. Let me give you
a quick example; two
friends meet on the street and exchange pleasantries. Upon parting one of them says, “I’ll see you soon,” to which
the other replies, “O K, see you
soon.” The interpretation of one
little word in this greeting ritual can change what the two friends are led to
expect regarding when they will meet again. To one person “soon” may mean sometime later in that very
day or within no more than a week, to the other it may mean an undefined time
in the future, depending upon circumstances. The word “soon” can represent different periods of time to
each of the friends, depending upon many variables such as experience,
education, upbringing and cultural understandings. In Mexico, for example, I had a carpenter make a set of
bookcases for me and when I asked him when he would be finished he said “Soon
seņor.” Three months later he was
still working on the bookcases.
Obviously “soon” meant something entirely
different to him than it did
to me.
So understanding words and
their varied meanings can be quite important at times. One of those times
is in our
Eucharistic worship.
In my last
few sermons I have undertaken to address, what for me, are meanings inherent in
various segments of the Eucharistic liturgy. It is my contention that the Eucharist contains a pattern
that shows us through words and actions how we can grow into the spiritually
mature human beings God created us to be.
Each segment of the Eucharist is meant to lead
us into a fuller realization
of our relationship with God and how we are to apply that understanding in our
daily lives. This Sunday I want to
address the portion of our Eucharistic liturgy referred to as the “Sanctus.” Since “Sanctus” is the Latin for “Holy”
that is where I will begin.
I will
use the contemporary wording of the “Sanctus” from Rite II for my
commentary. What follows is the
meaning of the “Sanctus” that has evolved for me since I first heard it as an
eleven year old to this day and time fifty-seven years later. You can find the
wording I will use on
page 362 of the Prayer Book.
Let me begin, as promised,
with the word’ “Holy.” The
following are meanings attached to that word by current dictionaries: that seem
appropriate to me. “Relating to, belonging to, or coming from a divine being or
power; devoted to the service of God,” and also “of a unique character, evoking
reverence.”
These phrases seem to me
to most accurately reflect the meaning most people attach to the word, “Holy.” Now, my question is, “When we sing
these words do we really mean it, not only during our worship but also in our
ongoing lives? Do we live, work
and relate with others as if we were doing so in the presence of One whom we
deem to be worthy of reverence, which, by the way the dictionaries tell us
means feelings of deep respect and devotion. Speaking for myself I can only confess that I fall short of
the mark more often than I like.
Yet at every Eucharist I proclaim my deep devotion
to that power I
understand God to be.
Yet as a
child of our culture I must admit that the pervasive presence of that One who
is to be revered is not always an actively conscious part of my behavior. Yet I am confronted,
as we repeat the “Sanctus,”
with a declaration that I revere God, as I understand the word, and that that
reverence pervades most of what I do.
I don’t know about you but thinking about
it in that way is very
sobering to me, in that I cannot lay claim to its actuality in many parts of my
life. It is in the Eucharist to
remind me, indeed all of us, that no matter what we may experience, God’s
pervasive presence is with us whatever we do and wherever we go. I view the Eucharist
as a weekly
remedial reminder of what the Christian faith claims regarding the omnipresence
of God. Speaking for myself it
might be a good idea to start each new day by saying the “Sanctus”. It sure couldn’t hurt me and it might
well help me.
Next I want to talk about
the words “God of power and might.”
I wonder what meanings are attached to that phrase
by each of us. The dictionary understanding of power
that I find most helpful is, “control and influence over other people and their
actions.” Before I get to the word
“might” let me say that I do not understand God as a grand puppet master who
manipulates we humans to do what God wants done. The power of God is mentioned in the Eucharist because it is
in this act of our corporate worship that we are called to remember and give
thanks for God’s willingness to suffer, so that we might know how much God
loves us. I see the Eucharist then
as a declaration that the power of God is not impositional, but rather it is
invitatory. The Eucharist is a
clear and cogent invitation to join with God in servant hood rather than
dictatorship. Jesus is the central
figure in this liturgical rite because Jesus is the exemplar of how God
perceives human life to be conducted, at least that is what our Christian faith
holds to be true. If we are in
agreement with this understanding we need to hear the question, “Do we
exemplify our exemplar?”
Again,
speaking for myself I have to confess that I fall a good bit short of meeting
the standard. Yet, amazingly
to me, I am privileged to stand at the altar and act as a host at the table of
God. This is also a very sobering
thought and the more I examine the Eucharist and its components the more awe
struck I am at God’s acceptance of my actions, on behalf of gathered
worshippers, at God’s table. Here
is a question for each of us, “Do we come to God’s table for comfort or for
strength to exemplify our Lord?”
That’s a tough question I know, yet I have
to honestly say that it is,
at the same time, a critical question in regard to how we exemplify
Christianity.
Now, to the word “might,”
which the dictionary tells us means “great power or influence, “Might””
is an interesting word, it has
served the advertising world very well over the years. We are very influence-able
creatures,
we humans, which is why Jay Davenport from Hendrix University tells us that the
religion of America is consumerism.
That does not speak too well for our willingness
to be placed under the
influence of the One we call God.
Yet every Sunday we say “God of power and
might,” or words to that
effect. I do understand that each
of us has moments when we intentionally act to place ourselves under God’s
influence, as we understand it through Jesus Christ. The critical issue is degree. So I ask myself, “On a scale of one to ten, what degree of
my life do I intentionally work to place under the influence of God, as I
understand that word?”
Well, I can
tell you that it’s not a ten for me, yet I pray that God’s grace may guide my
life towards that goal.
How about
you? What number enters your mind
as you review your willingness to place your life under the influence of God? That is another tough question that is
critical to how we, as a parish, affect our community. A bunch of you
must have some pretty
good scores on this because my wife tells me that she often hears from people,
when they learn where she worships, that St. Paul’s is known for its active
concern for others.
Now I want to address the
phrase, “heaven and earth are full of your glory.” All you have to do is pick a newspaper for any day of the
week and you’ll see information that seems to contradict that heaven and earth
are full of God’s glory.
Of course
it is a given that we cannot say that heaven isn’t filled with the glory of God
because we have no evidence to the contrary. I have no acquaintance with anyone who has been to heaven
and come back to give a report on what it’s like. So, regarding heaven I have decided to trust that God is in
control of the state of being that we call heaven until it can be proven
otherwise. As to the earth, that
is the realm of material reality, I have to conclude on the basis of what is
reported and my experience, that our world cultures and religions need a lot of
“cleaning up” before we can say that the “earth” is filled with the glory of
God.
Yet
there is the
consideration that a lot of God’s work goes on unnoticed. I dare say that
anyone who is a cynic
might point out to us that what we are declaring about God’s glory revealed in
creation sure doesn’t seem to bear up under careful examination. Yet what are we
to say of those many
unseen acts of love and concern that I propose happen every day all around our
globe? What about their effect on
those who experience them and pass on the benefit? And yes, there are a lot of places on our globe that are
engulfed in violence and the unnecessary loss and degradation of human
lives. Those are the things
newspapers present as front-page news.
Remember that a maxim of the newspaper business
is that, “If it bleeds
it leads.” Unfortunately that
seems to demonstrated every day.
The multitude of kindly actions and expressions
of concern for others
that make up a great deal of human activity are lost in the oft ignored inner
pages of newspapers, if they are even noted at all. Yet they are an ongoing and ever present part of human
interaction. Therefore I would
suggest to you that the phrase “heaven and earth are full of your glory” can
best be understood as a prayer of hope ,thanksgiving, and an ability to discern
God’s grace at work around us.
Now we come to a passage
that is often misunderstood because it uses the word, “Hosanna.” Modern dictionaries
tell us that this
is a shout of praise to God.
Yet
the Greek word used in the New Testament story of Jesus’ triumphal entrance
into Jerusalem is understood to mean “save us now,” or, “succor us now.” So properly understood this is a cry
for help and not just any cry, it’s a mighty shout of Help, for it says “Hosanna
in the highest.”
Interspersed is
the sentence, “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.” I believe we can
appropriately change
the masculine pronoun used here to, “the one,” so that it reads, “blessed is
the one who comes in the name of the Lord,” followed again by “Hosanna in the
highest.” Put all together I
understand these two segments to mean, “God please make yourself known to us,
we need your help desperately to be able to embody the holiness you call us to
through Christ.”
And immediately
following this declaration the consecration prayer of
the Eucharist begins.
I see the
implication of the placement of these two passages in the Eucharist as being a
clear reminder to all participants that God will provide what we need to move
toward being exemplifiers of Jesus Christ, the exemplar of God’s unremitting
love for all of creation.
We are
given the spiritual reality of the Christ Spirit each time we receive the
Eucharist, what use we make of this gift is up to each of us. So, I conclude
with a question for each
of us to consider, “How often do we accept the Bread and Wine as the real
presence of the Christ Spirit that will enable us to more fully demonstrate God’s
Love for all creation?”